A few weeks ago I recommended The Cassandra Sanction, by Scott Mariani. I called it a fantastic novel.
However, reader Toni Petrinovich does not agree. Here’s Toni’s take on it:
A different take on The Cassandra Sanction
Robert,
At your suggestion a few months ago, I picked up The Cassandra Sanction. I looked forward to reading about “climate change” in a fictional frame. I was so sorely disappointed. Out of 407 pages, 7 of them are given to any type of scientific explanation. The remainder 400 pages are run and gun dialogue.
With some hope and obvious hesitation, I then started (Michael Crichton’s) State of Fear. I found myself looking so forward to the quiet evening hours when I had time to read this incredible explanation of not just “climate change” but also many other issues that seem to plague the human species. Michael Crichton really outdid himself in this writing.
I am only sending you this email to let you know what a great difference was found in these two books by an avid reader of many genres. Perhaps others were captivated by The Cassandra Sanction. I am not one of them.
Thank you for the work you do on behalf of us all,
Toni Petrinovich
I agree with Toni that this is a “run-and-gun” book, and that there only a few pages devoted to “science.”
However, I think too much science might lead the general reader to ignore the book, and I think that would be a shame.
I’m glad to see the global warming hoax being attacked.
If the lack of science makes the book more palatable to the general reader, perhaps even gives it a chance of being made into a movie, then I applaud it.
Here’s my original recommendation:
The post A different take on The Cassandra Sanction appeared first on Ice Age Now.